Skip to content

MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

251 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. It would be nice to see if we could have dates of when files are uploaded. It can be very confusing when evidence is similar and there is no reference date of when it got uploaded.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Map CSF controls to COSO Principles in the HITRUST CSF Authoritative Sources Cross Reference

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. It appears that Salesforce does not have an SRM available. As a widely used product it may benefit many subscribers if they published an SRM for use.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. This would allow an assessed entity or assessor to highlight and mark test in documents and automatically create a link to the control requirement statement from which it was accessed and allow them to select the maturity domain that the highlighted text supports. This could also be granular enough to allow it to tie to requirement criteria as defined in illustrative procedures and listed in MyCSF.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Very confusing whether multiple people can work in an assessment at one time or not. Sometimes save works, sometimes it doesn't and reverts to previous states. Make it clear how it works with clear UX like in google docs.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. test from demo (old)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Please re-configure the Reports under Analytics to ensure that Requirement ID is part of the data pull. We manage this work at a requirement level and currently, every report that we run we have to do a cross-reference to pull in the requirement ID.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Can you update the "Change / Cancellation Policy" section on the Reservation tab to include the requirement that your submission date cannot be less than 2 weeks before the QA block selected. This requirement is not written out anywhere online but is enforced.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. It is difficult to reverse an assessment if a domain has been submitted. I am proposing making it easier for a submitter to reverse an assessment if it was submitted in error. Or add functionality so that organizational information can be updated even if a domain has been submitted for an external assessor review.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Currently, if we want to maintain our annual reassessment date, we need to submit our assessment on that specific date (i.e., we cannot submit an assessment earlier if it is ready). We should be able to submit at any point and mark the date of the submission, or simply keep the annual assessment date unless a different date is requested.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. When selecting the facilities where a platform/system is running, have the option to select all facilities rather than needing to go one-by-one.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. When completing the Platforms/Systems table, some fields are marked mandatory. The Applications & Databases fields are not. However, HITRUST QA requires something to be included here. Please mark these fields as mandatory up front to minimize these QA tasks/findings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Move the linked illustrative procedures button/link to the main expanded view of the individual control, as oppose to having to click "More Info".

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Steps to reproduce: Filter on rejected inheritance requests. Click "select All". Click on "remove" to delete the rejected requests. Poof! All your inheritance requests, even those already approved, will be gone. You can verify this without actually deleting them by clicking over to other views and observing all inheritance requests are selected after just selecting the rejected requests. Recovering from this bug is a manual, time consuming process.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. It would be helpful to organize the various authoritative sources on the factors page by type, similar to how the sources are organized in Microsoft's Trust Center. See pic for their example.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Linking evidence throughout an assessment is time-consuming. To make it a tiny bit easier, and specifically when adding an Excel file as evidence, MyCSF should look for a LINKAGE worksheet in the uploaded workbook. If found, MyCSF should use the contents of that LINKAGE sheet to know where to link the workbook throughout the assessment.

    The contents of the linkage sheet could be as simple as:
    • column A: BUID or CVID of the requirement to link the workbook to
    • column B: Link to the Policy level (Yes/No)
    • column C: Link to the Process level (Yes/No)
    • column…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Similar to the customer's offline assessment, the external assessors would like to have this ability as well.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 12 13
  • Don't see your idea?