MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. For timesheets and QA Sheets - it would be best to have this done electronically. Especially since we are remote - it's easier to have Executive and QA use the same document and electronically sign/initial.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. for N/A requirements, change to a single "agree with N/A"

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Remove edit check that requires client to upload a rep letter in order to submit a domain to the assessor. This is too early in the process to provide a rep letter - currently, clients must upload a fake / placeholder document as a workaround.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Started  ·  1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would be great if there was an option to sort/filter requirements based on the Unique ID, not just the level or control.

    30 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Add a checkbox or field for external reviewers to sign off on requirement statement after they have reviewed them.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Within an Assessment, the tool should clearly indicate/label inputs that are included in the HITRUST issued Report.

    15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Proposed  ·  2 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. There are times when the addition of assessor team quality review pushes past the 90-day window. We get backlogged the same way you do. We always adhere to the 90-day window for accepting and reviewing evidence, and we can demonstrate that reasonably. But it would be helpful if there was some flexibility around the submission date. If we plug in the real dates of assessment, and then submit 91 days after we started testing, the system errors due to >90.

    Introducing the notion of the defined assessment window of 90 days, and the CHQP review period (stated dates) might help…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Capability that allows a user to submit a reverted Question to their External Assessor without waiting for the Domain and/or Assessment to be completed.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. HITRUST's guidance allows zero-population requirements to be scored at fully compliant on the implemented level IF a well-defined policy and procedure exists for the assessed entity to observe should the related activity occur. However, MyCSF doesn't currently do a good job of allowing assessed entities and assessors to efficiently communicate this scenario. Because MyCSF requires that evidence be linked to a scored implemented PRISMA level, assessors are often forced to tag the policy or procedure documents to the implemented PRISMA level in this scenario. To remedy, MyCSF should offer a flag (e.g., a checkbox) which can be used to communicate…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Can we add an enhancement to add the control reference to the requirement statements layout. Like the below. People have a hard time of telling what the requirements are related to without the name. Example is the constant confusion on 09.x and 09.y controls. They are all e-commerce and online transaction but some of them do not have either of those terms within the statement so people think it is just a standalone control.

    09.x Electronic Commerce Services
    !1579275197061-0.png!

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Date of Submission should be when HT approves Assessment

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. MyCSF will automatically delete the draft report files 7 days after the final reports are posted.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Provide assessors the ability to revert entire domains back to clients- even if the feature was only available when the status of the domain is "assessor review pending". This would avoid needing to request HITRUST to revert domains if clients accidentally hit submit too early.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Feature allowing a user to edit or remove a diary entry

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. The ability for customers to create their own tags on the Requirement Statements and sort/filter based upon their custom tags.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. There needs to be a half-way point between the requirement statement and domain level for delegating responsibilities. It would be nice to have the ability to select multiple requirement statements within a domain and then delegate those statements rather than completing each one individually.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Functionality for someone to either select recipients or use the "@" symbol to quick search for them like Outlook. Any individuals tagged would be notified of a Diary concerning them.

    The capability should also be present at the general Assessment level without being associated with an Assessment Statement.

    External people should be able to @ HITRUST users that have commented previously in the chain.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Make the "Expand All" button a toggle button. Currently the "Expand All" button can only be used to expand all of the requirements in the active domain. I'd like for it to change to "Collapse All" after it has been pressed, allowing the users to collapse all of the requirements in the domain.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Phase I: Saving at the requirement level is extremely tedious. Please look into automatically saving when you navigate to the next requirement in the domain. Otherwise users will have to click save on every single requirement independently.

    configurable by users above assessment check box.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Performing & Submitting Assessments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1
  • Don't see your idea?