When you have a level 3 Requirement statement, can the level 1 and level 2 requirement statement for that same control be removed from the assessment? This would remove redundancy, by not having to ask the business for evidence at each level because it would be inclusive in the level 3. This would also lower the number of overall baselines while still covering the control.

Specifically enumerate all required policy statements and items for each requirement at the policy and procedure level as a checklist. Hiding specific requirements inside the repetitive narrative of the illustrative procedures makes it extremely difficult to parse-out what is required in policy and procedure documentation. While you're at it, remove the repetitive language all together since it's obvious for each control that "ad hoc or well understood blah blah" is already partially acceptable by your rubric and focus on giving more examples of acceptable language or implementations or links to relevant information.

There should be a date for a CSF version's expiration shown when on the Name and Security page.

Allow for targeting assessments against APEC programs

When users are completing a CSF Assessment the Authoritative Source section should be shown when hovering over an Assessment Statement.

There should be an info logo for the user to hover over

Ability to run a report that mirrors the CSF Summary Changes

Give users the ability to search a CSF library for strings.

Ability to expand out the elements of the library en masse. For example press a button to show all of the children under the Control Categories section for easier searching.