Skip to content

MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

8 results found

  1. When selecting the facilities where a platform/system is running, have the option to select all facilities rather than needing to go one-by-one.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. When completing the Platforms/Systems table, some fields are marked mandatory. The Applications & Databases fields are not. However, HITRUST QA requires something to be included here. Please mark these fields as mandatory up front to minimize these QA tasks/findings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. It would be helpful to organize the various authoritative sources on the factors page by type, similar to how the sources are organized in Microsoft's Trust Center. See pic for their example.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. remove acccess to previous subscriber's data if non renewal

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. MyCSF should have a mechanism to suggest scoping factor changes based upon a pattern of Not Applicables applied when responding to the Assessment

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I'd like to see the scoping factors that are optional / discretionary (namely the regulatory factors) clearly labeled as such, or even moved into their own page containing a disclaimer that they are optional. For the rest of the factors (which MUST be accurate), I'd like to see them clearly labeled as such or on their own page with a tagline describing that they must be accurately entered.

    33 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. When customer is selecting and inputting data in the Administrative Details and Factors tab have the information button for each question like in 1.0- definition for each org type question and reg factor

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Give the Assessor Organizations the ability to populate Assessments with Library Versions that are either in the state of "Published" or "Preview"

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?