Skip to content

MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

306 results found

  1. To allow Interim assessments to be "published" for inheritance to show score changes from CAPs validated as addressed and closed OR progress on CAP closure from the orginal valdiated report. This would be advantagous for service providers or clients that rely on vednor/ 3rd party maintaining HITRUST certification and uitilize the portal inheritance feature in the portal to request inheritance on applicable controls based on services being rendered.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. break out the evaluative elements with a checkblock for completion. Also, add the ability for evaluative elements to be assigned to different users.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Please return the bulk download functionality. This is very useful at multiple stages of an assessment, especially for text searching and opening multiple documents at once on multiple monitors. -
    - update permissions set for assessors assigned to a subscriber's validated assessment object to do bulk download of the mapped documentation whether loaded by customer or assessor.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. It would help assessors if the unique ID was visible for each task presented in the QA Task List. Currently, we need to drill into each task to uncover what control needs to be addressed. There are tasks related to something not related to a control (i.e. "Scope of the Assessment"), so obviously those would not display a control ID and would show as a empty field value.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Upon review of sample testing required for a v9.5 assessment, I noticed that quite a few controls have illustrative procedures that state "select a sample of . . .", however when you look in MyCSF the control requirement, they don't have the "Implemented: Sampling" flag. Is there a plan to ensure the flag is evident for all control requirements in MyCSF that require sample testing per IP?

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be helpful to partially unlock the specific items/areas that QA has assigned tasks to post submission. Currently, we have to request help from the support team and it prolongs the process of QA unnecessarily.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I suggest implementing fine-grain assessment object reversion when subscriber changes (e.g., to requirement scores, NA statements, CAPs, and external inheritance requests) are needed post-submission. Under the current system, it seems that such changes require reversion of the entire object, which then calls for revalidating all requirements (rather than just the updated ones). Fine-grain reversion would support greater assessment efficiency, less rework, and less frustration for subscribers. Also, MyCSF would more accurately reflect workflow status, without resetting the status of previously completed phases/tasks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. domains, this sort order (whether ascending or descending) makes it easier to quickly find specific requirements. This is especially true when working between MyCSF and an assessment test plan (typically during scoring, commenting, and evidence mapping), because test plans tend to feature this sort order also.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I suggest that HITRUST publishes a quarterly release note digest to summarize changes for users. Under the Release Notes section of MyCSF Help, no new notes have been published since June 2021; yet, MyCSF has changed dramatically (especially regarding workflow and status management) since this time. The digests can be published under the Release Notes section, or (even better) emailed to registered MyCSF users.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. change the left to right sort order of assessment presets to align with assurance provided....r2 should be left, i1 center, e1 right.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. In V11, when exporting controls the language removes all formatting and numbering, making it difficult to trace back actions to the sub-requirements. Given the importance of the list breakdown this should be included ASAP. If the formatting is a challenge due to Excel/CSV, the numbering should still be included.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. At times our organization has reached our object capacity. We would like to export all of our entire object and reports, but it is currently a manually intensive process. For peace of mind, we want to export everything from a previous object, then archive or delete it. Current the process is manual with reports having to be downloaded one at a time. A bulk download and export feature would be so nice.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Create a report that shows a list of the Evaluative Elements for each requirement statement similar to the Illustrative Procedures report - this will help both assessors and assessed entities with ensuring that they are meeting the EEs when working in offline testing workbooks without clicking into each requirement statement within MyCSF.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. The screenshots in deminar are not visible

    0 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. It would be nice to see if we could have dates of when files are uploaded. It can be very confusing when evidence is similar and there is no reference date of when it got uploaded.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Map CSF controls to COSO Principles in the HITRUST CSF Authoritative Sources Cross Reference

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. It appears that Salesforce does not have an SRM available. As a widely used product it may benefit many subscribers if they published an SRM for use.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. This would allow an assessed entity or assessor to highlight and mark test in documents and automatically create a link to the control requirement statement from which it was accessed and allow them to select the maturity domain that the highlighted text supports. This could also be granular enough to allow it to tie to requirement criteria as defined in illustrative procedures and listed in MyCSF.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?