Skip to content

MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

316 results found

  1. Add reporting of user activity. Specifically provide reporting of returned requirements (user activity reporting) for an assessment. Providing the ability to specific a date range and see the user specific activities on each requirement (history).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. The CAP Report that Subscribers and Assessors can download should include a column to indicate which maturity domains (policy, process, or implemented) are deficient. This will help subscribers and assessors review CAPs to ensure that the corrective actions are addressing all deficient levels.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Create a Report that can identify any mandatory Corrective Actions using the existing scores of the Statements in an Assessment

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When HITRUST reverts an submitted assessment back to either an assessor or to the subscriber, MyCSF should have a field available for HITRUST to state why the assessment was reverted. This field should be required, and this field's contents should be made visible to the subscriber and assessor.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. There are times when the addition of assessor team quality review pushes past the 90-day window. We get backlogged the same way you do. We always adhere to the 90-day window for accepting and reviewing evidence, and we can demonstrate that reasonably. But it would be helpful if there was some flexibility around the submission date. If we plug in the real dates of assessment, and then submit 91 days after we started testing, the system errors due to >90.

    Introducing the notion of the defined assessment window of 90 days, and the CHQP review period (stated dates) might help…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. There needs to be a half-way point between the requirement statement and domain level for delegating responsibilities. It would be nice to have the ability to select multiple requirement statements within a domain and then delegate those statements rather than completing each one individually.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. The ability to edit and delete information for systems and facilities including the ability to removing them from "other" in order to keep organizational information clean.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. MyCSF should have a messaging center to allow individuals with access to an object (customers, assessors, HITRUST) to send and receive messages securely.

    Message recipients would receive an email notification that would indicate: You have received a new message from <Entity> regarding <Assessment Object>. Please login to MyCSF and go to your message center to retrieve this message.

    Additional Fields:
    1. Object – allows selection of object based on those that you have access to.
    2. Response Required – Checkbox used for SLA tracking purposes
    3. CC – Multiselect restricted to those with access to selected object.
    4. Attachment –…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Users should be able to add documents (e.g., screenshots, workpapers, validated report agreement, participation letter) by simply emailing a MyCSF email address, similar to what TripIt lets you do with travel itineraries. There should be a way to specify in the email body and/or subject which assessment, CSF requirement statement(s), and PRISMA levels that the document should be linked to.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. In the "Corrective Action Plan" modal / pop-up accessible by pressing the "Edit" button for a single CAP listed in the "Corrective Action Plans" page: The "Linked Statements" area should contain hyperlinks. Specifically, the "Assessment", "Domain", and "Baseline Unique ID" columns should all be populated with hyperlinks.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. The user guide needs better instruction on how to submit an object to HITRUST, like a click-by-click walk through.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. I'd like to see the submission to HITRUST workflow be expanded to require that both the external assessor AND the customer approve the submission of the assessment object to HITRUST.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Ability to version documents in the tool

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Allow users to schedule requests for updates from delegated users of a Statement. A filtered view of their Statements would need to be extended to them with a clearly labeled due date.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Allow a User to specify the due date of a Statement that has been assigned to an individual. Notifications centered around these Statements 7310 days from deadline.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Submitting revisions to the draft report was very difficult. I had 3 revisions. The first one was duplicated 3 times instead of saving three separate ones. The second when posted refused to accept the correct section of the report that I had entered; it changed it to a different section of its own accord. I tried it twice, and it did it every time. So instead of 3 revisions, I now have 6, 3 of which are either duplicate or incorrect because of MyCSF. I have no way to delete the incorrect revisions once added. The interface needs to be…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. We see 9.6 in the dropdown box but I cannot select it.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Description of how the Systems are Accessed by all parties should be a separate column and not embedded in the Description portion. It is not intuitive that Access is part of the Description. Access is a separate attribute and should be treated as such.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When the "need help?" popup shows up and suggests related pages from the MyCSF User Guide, the links just go to the User Guide landing page rather than the specific page that addresses the question.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Unable to save the progress after uploading the documents. The Response Status: External assessor review pending. Please link evidence to the implemented level

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?