307 results found
-
Update "Change / Cancellation Policy" section on the Reservation tab
Can you update the "Change / Cancellation Policy" section on the Reservation tab to include the requirement that your submission date cannot be less than 2 weeks before the QA block selected. This requirement is not written out anywhere online but is enforced.
1 vote -
Make it easier to recall or reverse and assessment
It is difficult to reverse an assessment if a domain has been submitted. I am proposing making it easier for a submitter to reverse an assessment if it was submitted in error. Or add functionality so that organizational information can be updated even if a domain has been submitted for an external assessor review.
1 vote -
SSO through OIDC or SAML
SSO through OIDC or SAML. For a framework that places a heavy emphasis on role-based access controls and centralized identity management it seems only fitting that HITRUST implemented either OIDC or SAML.
12 votes -
API for External Assessor
Similar to the customer's offline assessment, the external assessors would like to have this ability as well.
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Required CAP Analytics Options
Currently there doesn't seem to be a single report that can be run that would filter all requirements needing a CAP AND the assessor comments. This may overlap with upcoming offline CAP worksheets, but currently is a manual process to create something incorporating all the information internal stakeholders want to see.
3 votes -
Selecting filtered inheritance requests should not select ALL inheritance requests
Steps to reproduce: Filter on rejected inheritance requests. Click "select All". Click on "remove" to delete the rejected requests. Poof! All your inheritance requests, even those already approved, will be gone. You can verify this without actually deleting them by clicking over to other views and observing all inheritance requests are selected after just selecting the rejected requests. Recovering from this bug is a manual, time consuming process.
1 vote -
Issue with offline upload
Hello, I'm having issues uploading the offline assessment to Opt1 – Shearwater Health 2022 Validated Assessment. It's saying 0 rows saved and 0 blank rows were skipped, but not updating the scores
2 votes -
Bulk Deletion
This is especially relevant to cloned assessments in my experience, but it would be nice if MyCSF had a feature to bulk-delete uploaded documents in the "Documents" section.
5 votes -
RDS
Add RDS button to the top panel - not intuitive as to how to get back to the options page
2 votes -
Adding a "LINKAGE" sheet in uploaded Excel workbooks tells MyCSF where to link the sheet throughout the assessment
Linking evidence throughout an assessment is time-consuming. To make it a tiny bit easier, and specifically when adding an Excel file as evidence, MyCSF should look for a LINKAGE worksheet in the uploaded workbook. If found, MyCSF should use the contents of that LINKAGE sheet to know where to link the workbook throughout the assessment.
The contents of the linkage sheet could be as simple as:
• column A: BUID or CVID of the requirement to link the workbook to
• column B: Link to the Policy level (Yes/No)
• column C: Link to the Process level (Yes/No)
• column…1 vote -
Display unsent External Inheritance Requests in Assessor view also
Can you add the External Inheritance status to the main page for the Assessor view also? The status is displayed on our client's view and it would be good to have the same status in the Assessor view so that we can track and ensure our clients indeed submitted the inheritance requests to the external entity.
6 votes -
support needed
having errors when clicking on details view for myCSF HITRUST controls and details. Please advise if you can see that in logs and how I can document the error.
1 vote -
Ability to inherit just the policy level (or just the policy and process levels)
Add the ability to inherit specific control maturity levels (e.g., just policy, just policy and process). This will be very helpful for internal inheritance, for situations where the same policies are used by the whole organization.
1 vote -
Group assessments
Group assessments by year
3 votes -
Assessors shouldn't have to do anything on "not started" CAPs at interim
It would be nice that if a CAP is not started that MyCSF would be aware of such and not expect the assessor to do anything at interim. This would include attaching documentation since there is technically nothing for them to review. It is not user friendly to have to attach a document because the old score warrants it when there has not been any work done it.
2 votes -
Add some way to identify when a control is required to be sampled.
Peer the test plan requirement, is there any way within MyCSF where the assessor can note this is SAMPLED requirement, so then the client does not submit evidence that cannot be used since the control request sampling?
19 votes -
Feedback Forum Usability
Feedback Forum Access not intuitive - trying to get to the main feedback forum page but there is no link and accessing the feedback feature does not allow the user to actually navigate to the broader feedback forum itself. Usability overall for Feedback and CAPs is an issue that results in highly inefficient time usage.
1 vote -
michael.frederick@hitrustalliance.net
When an interim is generated it should also pull the documentation that was linked into the document library for the assessment and show the names of the documents within the expanded control requirement statement window. This will allow for all work to be done from within the interim versus having to hop between it and its associated full assessment. It would not link the documents, just pull them into the library and provide the listing. Links can be added once documents are updated for most current version.
4 votes -
When viewing the linked documents for a particular Requirement Statement, each document should show the date that it was linked .
When viewing the linked documents for the Requirement Statements, each document should show the date that it was linked without having to go through the document repository especially in situations where we request for additional evidence from the assessor. From some assessments I have done so far, I noticed the assessors do not make reference to the newly linked documents so we have to go to the repository to check the date for all documents to see if any was added outside their testing period. This would really help to save time during QA review.
6 votes
- Don't see your idea?