Skip to content

MyCSF

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

307 results found

  1. Have an option to automatically generate a CAP entry for all requirements scored with a gap. CAP name would include (Auto "control name" )

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. In addition to having the option to include only certain parts of the authoritative source in a compliance pack, the option should also exist to have the compliance pack only include those sections of the authoritative source with an average score falling within a specified range (e.g., below 60, between 60-70, etc.). This will allow for the breaking out of the areas warranting remediation / further review.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. When a similar requirement statement is applicable for multiple regulatory factors, only have that requirement statement appear once in the scoped assessment, currently they can appear multiple times in an assessment.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. The No Active Subscribers error message should be more specific concerning the actual error. It currently displays when a user is not assigned to any assessments or when the subscriber account has expired. A more descriptive error message would prevent confusion and assist is resolving the actual issue earlier without client frustration.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. User activity - would like the ability to pull reporting on assessments of returned requirements and if possible other related user activity.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Add a checkbox or field for external reviewers to sign off on requirement statement after they have reviewed them.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. with the increased usage of MyCSF by non-US based users all dates should be switched to Month DD, YYYY format from the MM/DD/YYYY format currently used to avoid confusion

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Scoped to any authoritative source or combination or multiple sources
    Would require updates to the Assurance process and program
    Can be based on any tailored combination controls

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Allow for targeting assessments against APEC programs

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. delegation percentage graph

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. show indication of who entered customer scoring- customer or internal assessor

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Please create a report feature to generate 'completed' requirement statements have have no documentation linked. This will help the internal assessor send out follow up emails to ensure the assessment is ready for the external assessor to review.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Please create a warning alert or prevention function that requires the statement owner to upload the appropriate supporting documentation.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Add the ability to include dairy entries in reports.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. When a file is uploaded evidence into an assessment, MyCSF should be able recognize special strings filename to automatically link the file with control maturity levels and/or requirements.

    Some examples:
    • A document uploaded with a title of "New hire population [Imp].xlsx" would automatically be linked to the requirement's implemented level.
    • A file titled "IT security policies [Pol, Pro].pdf" would automatically be linked to the policy and procedure levels.
    • An uploaded document with a title of "Termination samples IMP 3334.0.xlsx" would automatically be linked to the implemented level of the requirement with the CVID of 3334.0.

    This could…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. The mouse cursor icon when mousing over rows of the 'Corrective Action Plans' page (where all of the CAPs are listed in a table) is confusing. It always displays as a hand when mousing over any part of the CAPs table, which makes me think I'm mousing over a link. However, the only links in the table are buttons in the far-right of the table. I think this is a bug. The fix is to correct the cursor icon when mousing over the non-linked areas of the table.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. In the "Corrective Action Plan" modal / pop-up accessible by pressing the "Edit" button for a single CAP listed in the "Corrective Action Plans" page: The "Corrective Action" field is way too small. It's only 3 lines tall, and it makes it very, very hard to read.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Capability to delegate specific maturities of a Statement

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. The Admin topic in the user guide doesn't mention how to add a user. Also the 3.2 section shouldn't discuss the people tab. It should highlight the topics underneath it.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?