10 results found
-
Adjust Wording in Task Under Domain 18
Type: Organizational . Level: 1 . ID: 1828.08a1Organizational.12
Missing word in policy portion under Illustrated Procedures: "Computers that store or process covered information are located in areas that are unattended and have unrestricted access by the public."
Adjusted sentence would be "Computers that store or process covered information are never located in areas..."
1 vote -
6 votes
-
4 votes
-
An easy way to determine exact number of CSF elements in the policy illustrative procedure
Assessors and assessed entities could benefit from something communicating the exact number of CSF implementation specifications present in the policy illustrative procedures. This could be through something like a number that precedes the policy illustrative procedure or even consistent use of roman numerals in the policy illustrative procedure. This would help everyone involved in preparing for, performing, and reviewing assessments ensure they are working with a generally understood denominator for scoring calculations.
For example:
Instead of saying "Inspect written policies to determine that they contain X, Y, and Z.", the policy illustrative procedure could display as,
"Inspect written policies to…14 votes -
Make all 44 authoritative sources into optional (selectable) regulatory factors
When setting up a new assessment, only a subset of the 44 authoritative sources in the CSF today are selectable / optional regulatory factors. Instead, 44 authoritative sources should be made into optional (selectable) regulatory factors.
2 votes -
2 votes
-
in v10: No requirements should dictate scope
In the requirement, "Risk designations are assigned for all positions in the organization", a scope of the whole organization is forced through the wording. In v10, no requirements should dictate scope in and of themselves and should instead be written in such a way that they can be tested to the assessment's scope.
4 votes -
2 votes
-
1 vote
-
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?